Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Anthropic
Anthropic
vs
Xiaomi

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Claude Sonnet 4.6 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Benchmark Advantage
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Speed
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureClaude Sonnet 4.6MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorAnthropicXiaomi
ReleasedFeb 2026Mar 2026

Claude Sonnet 4.6 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to MiMo v2 Omni's score of 35.5.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1,000,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 supports vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.