Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Minimax
Minimax

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduMinimax
ReleasedOct 2025Mar 2026

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.