Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Stepfun-ai

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduStepfun-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.