Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Xiaomi

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.