Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Xiaomi

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Best Coding Model Leaderboard Find the top LLM for coding by benchmarks and community votes

114 out of our 298 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.07$0.09 ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.28$0.29 ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$45000.00 MiMo-V2-Flash
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking is 13% cheaper overall.

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Providers

Novita $0.07 (Cheapest)

MiMo-V2-Flash Providers

Chutes $0.09 (Cheapest)
AtlasCloud $0.10
Xiaomi $0.10
Novita $0.10

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Wins
0
MiMo-V2-Flash Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-30.6-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-25.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-67.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-74.4-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-65.6-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-40.2-
MiMo-V2-Flash significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking
131,072
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
MiMo-V2-Flash has a 50% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-FlashWinner
Tokens/secondN/A141.8 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A1.19s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3B ThinkingMiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Dec 2025

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking with:

Compare MiMo-V2-Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Thinking does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.