Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Minimax
Minimax

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 21B A3BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 21B A3BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduMinimax
ReleasedAug 2025Mar 2026

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.28/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B has a 120,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 21B A3B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.