Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Minimax
Minimax

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduMinimax
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper input pricing at $0.28/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B's score of 14.5.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.