Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Xiaomi

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 300B A47BMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduXiaomi
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper input pricing at $0.28/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B's score of 14.5.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.