Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Minimax
Minimax

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBaiduMinimax
ReleasedAug 2025Feb 2026

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.56/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has a 30,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.