Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3BGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2025Jan 2026

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper input pricing at $0.14/M tokens. ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has cheaper output pricing at $0.56/M tokens.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B has a 30,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 28B A3B supports vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.