Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Baidu
Baidu
vs
Minimax
Minimax

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B wins:

  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorBaiduMinimax
ReleasedJun 2025Mar 2026

ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B's score of N/A.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B has a 123,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
ERNIE 4.5 VL 424B A47B supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.