Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed

Seed 1.6 Flash vs Seed 2.0 Lite

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

Seed 2.0 Lite wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Seed 2.0 Lite
Context Window
Seed 2.0 Lite
Speed
Seed 2.0 Lite

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashSeed 2.0 Lite
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashSeed 2.0 Lite
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedBytedance-seed
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Seed 2.0 Lite Modalities

Input
textimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Seed 1.6 Flash with:

Compare Seed 2.0 Lite with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Seed 2.0 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 21.4, compared to Seed 1.6 Flash's score of N/A.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while Seed 2.0 Lite has a 262,144 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. Seed 2.0 Lite supports vision.