Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Seed 1.6 Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
Seed 1.6 Flash
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6 FlashMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6 FlashMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedMinimax
ReleasedDec 2025Mar 2026

Seed 1.6 Flash Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Seed 1.6 Flash with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Seed 1.6 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to Seed 1.6 Flash's score of N/A.
Seed 1.6 Flash has a 262,144 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
Seed 1.6 Flash supports vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.