Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance-seed
Bytedance-seed
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Seed 1.6 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Seed 1.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Seed 1.6
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
GPT-5.2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureSeed 1.6GPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertySeed 1.6GPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorBytedance-seedOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Dec 2025

Seed 1.6 Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Seed 1.6 with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Seed 1.6 has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. Seed 1.6 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Seed 1.6's score of N/A.
Seed 1.6 has a 262,144 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Seed 1.6 supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.