Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Bytedance
Bytedance
vs
Minimax
Minimax

UI-TARS 7B vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

UI-TARS 7B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
UI-TARS 7B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureUI-TARS 7BMiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyUI-TARS 7BMiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorBytedanceMinimax
ReleasedJul 2025Feb 2026

UI-TARS 7B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

UI-TARS 7B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. UI-TARS 7B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
UI-TARS 7B has a 128,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
UI-TARS 7B supports vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.