Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Command A vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand ADeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand ADeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereDeepseek
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision.