Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

Command A vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand ADeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.40 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$1.20 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.20 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 86% cheaper overall.

Command A Providers

No provider data available

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Command A Wins
6
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand ADeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.529.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
9.937.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
13.096.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.286.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
52.787.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.789.6
Aider
Real-world code editing
12.0--
AIME
Competition math
9.7--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Command A
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command A
256,000
tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Command A has a 36% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand ADeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Tokens/second35.0 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.48s0.00s
Command A responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand ADeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand ADeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereDeepseek
ReleasedMar 2025Dec 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command A with:

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision.