Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Microsoft
Microsoft

Command A vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

WizardLM-2 8x22B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
WizardLM-2 8x22B
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AWizardLM-2 8x22B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AWizardLM-2 8x22B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereMicrosoft
ReleasedMar 2025Apr 2024

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

WizardLM-2 8x22B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper input pricing at $0.62/M tokens. WizardLM-2 8x22B has cheaper output pricing at $0.62/M tokens.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while WizardLM-2 8x22B has a 65,535 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. WizardLM-2 8x22B does not support vision.