Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Command A vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AKimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AKimi K2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereMoonshotai
ReleasedMar 2025Jan 2026

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.38/M tokens. Kimi K2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.72/M tokens.
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Kimi K2.5 supports vision.