Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Command A vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand ALlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand ALlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereNvidia
ReleasedMar 2025Oct 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Command A scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.9, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 7.6.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.