Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Command A vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereNvidia
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Command A scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.