Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Command A vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Command A
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 98% cheaper overall.

Command A Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Command A Wins
4
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.513.2-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
9.97.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
13.062.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
71.273.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
52.755.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
28.770.1
Aider
Real-world code editing
12.0--
AIME
Competition math
9.7--
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 shows stronger mathematical reasoning abilities.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Command A
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command A
256,000
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens
Command A has a 49% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second35.0 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.48s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds 292% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand ANemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereNvidia
ReleasedMar 2025Sep 2025

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command A with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Command A scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 9.9, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.