Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Z-ai

Command A vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Command A wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Context Window
Command A
Speed
Command A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand AGLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand AGLM-5V Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereZ-ai
ReleasedMar 2025Apr 2026

Command A Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM-5V Turbo has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. GLM-5V Turbo has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GLM-5V Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.2, compared to Command A's score of 9.9.
Command A has a 256,000 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Command A does not support vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.