Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Command R (08-2024) vs MiniMax M2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Command R (08-2024) wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

MiniMax M2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Command R (08-2024)
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.5
Context Window
MiniMax M2.5
Speed
MiniMax M2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand R (08-2024)MiniMax M2.5
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorCohereMinimax
ReleasedAug 2024Feb 2026

Command R (08-2024) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command R (08-2024) with:

Compare MiniMax M2.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.12/M tokens. Command R (08-2024) has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.4, compared to Command R (08-2024)'s score of N/A.
Command R (08-2024) has a 128,000 token context window, while MiniMax M2.5 has a 196,608 token context window.
Command R (08-2024) does not support vision. MiniMax M2.5 does not support vision.