Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Command R+ (08-2024) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command R+ (08-2024) wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$0.90 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$10.00$0.90 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 79% cheaper overall.

Command R+ (08-2024) Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Command R+ (08-2024) Wins
3
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
33.613.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
38.069.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
13.446.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
38.354.9
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
42.8--
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Command R+ (08-2024)
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command R+ (08-2024)
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand R+ (08-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereNvidia
ReleasedAug 2024Oct 2024

Command R+ (08-2024) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command R+ (08-2024) with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Command R+ (08-2024)'s score of N/A.
Command R+ (08-2024) has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Command R+ (08-2024) does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.