Key Takeaways
Command R7B (12-2024) wins:
- No clear advantages in compared metrics
Mistral Nemo wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
- Larger context window
- Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
N/A
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Command R7B (12-2024) | Mistral Nemo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.02 | Mistral Nemo |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.04 | Mistral Nemo |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | N/A | $0.01 | Mistral Nemo |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 62% cheaper overall.
Command R7B (12-2024) Providers
No provider data available
Mistral Nemo Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
4
Benchmarks Compared
0
Command R7B (12-2024) Wins
0
Mistral Nemo Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Command R7B (12-2024) | Mistral Nemo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | - | 25.0 | - |
MMLU Pro Academic knowledge | - | 26.4 | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | - | 8.7 | - |
BBH Big-Bench Hard | - | 36.1 | - |
Both models show comparable benchmark performance.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Command R7B (12-2024)
128,000
tokens
Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Mistral Nemo has a 2% larger context window.
Speed Performance
Speed benchmarks not available for these models
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Command R7B (12-2024) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Command R7B (12-2024) | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Author | Cohere | Mistral AI |
| Released | Dec 2024 | Jul 2024 |
Command R7B (12-2024) Modalities
Input
text
Output
text
Mistral Nemo Modalities
Input
text
Output
text