Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command R7B (12-2024) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Command R7B (12-2024)
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand R7B (12-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.90 Command R7B (12-2024)
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.90 Command R7B (12-2024)
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Command R7B (12-2024) is 93% cheaper overall.

Command R7B (12-2024) Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Command R7B (12-2024) Wins
0
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-13.4-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-69.0-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-46.5-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-54.9-
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command R7B (12-2024)
128,000
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand R7B (12-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R7B (12-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand R7B (12-2024)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereNvidia
ReleasedDec 2024Oct 2024

Command R7B (12-2024) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command R7B (12-2024) with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Command R7B (12-2024) has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Command R7B (12-2024) has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Command R7B (12-2024)'s score of N/A.
Command R7B (12-2024) has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Command R7B (12-2024) does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.