Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Cohere
Cohere
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Command R7B (12-2024) vs GPT-5 Nano

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Command R7B (12-2024) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 Nano wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Command R7B (12-2024)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Nano
Context Window
GPT-5 Nano
Speed
GPT-5 Nano

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricCommand R7B (12-2024)GPT-5 NanoWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.05 Command R7B (12-2024)
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.40 Command R7B (12-2024)
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$5000.00 GPT-5 Nano
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Command R7B (12-2024) is 52% cheaper overall.

Command R7B (12-2024) Providers

Cohere $0.04 (Cheapest)

GPT-5 Nano Providers

OpenAI $0.05 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.05 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Command R7B (12-2024) Wins
0
GPT-5 Nano Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkCommand R7B (12-2024)GPT-5 NanoWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
-26.7-
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-20.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-83.7-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
-78.0-
GPQA
Graduate-level science
-67.6-
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-78.9-
GPT-5 Nano significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Command R7B (12-2024)
128,000
tokens
Max output: 4,000 tokens
GPT-5 Nano
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5 Nano has a 68% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricCommand R7B (12-2024)GPT-5 NanoWinner
Tokens/secondN/A141.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A110.10s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCommand R7B (12-2024)GPT-5 Nano
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCommand R7B (12-2024)GPT-5 Nano
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorCohereOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2024Aug 2025

Command R7B (12-2024) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5 Nano Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Command R7B (12-2024) with:

Compare GPT-5 Nano with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Command R7B (12-2024) has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Command R7B (12-2024) has cheaper output pricing at $0.15/M tokens.
GPT-5 Nano scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 20.3, compared to Command R7B (12-2024)'s score of N/A.
Command R7B (12-2024) has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5 Nano has a 400,000 token context window.
Command R7B (12-2024) does not support vision. GPT-5 Nano supports vision.