Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
GPT-5.4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BGPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 109BGPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper input pricing at $0.18/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has cheaper output pricing at $0.59/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 109B does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.