Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
Minimax
Minimax

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
MiniMax M2.7

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 405BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 405BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoMinimax
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Modalities

Input
Output

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper input pricing at $0.30/M tokens. MiniMax M2.7 has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has a 131,072 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.