Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 405BGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 405BGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.2-Codex has cheaper input pricing at $1.75/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has cheaper output pricing at $3.50/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 405B does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.