Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepcogito
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCogito V2 Preview Llama 70BGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCogito V2 Preview Llama 70BGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepcogitoOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B has cheaper input pricing at $0.88/M tokens. Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Cogito V2 Preview Llama 70B does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.