Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMeta-llama
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2024

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.32/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct's score of 10.7.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.