Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Voxtral Small 24B 2507
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Modalities

Input
textaudio
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has a 32,000 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 does not support vision.