Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Nousresearch
Nousresearch

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Hermes 4 70B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Hermes 4 70B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
Price Advantage
Hermes 4 70B
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
Hermes 4 70B
Speed
Hermes 4 70B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1Hermes 4 70B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1Hermes 4 70B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekNousresearch
ReleasedAug 2025Aug 2025

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Hermes 4 70B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Hermes 4 70B has cheaper input pricing at $0.13/M tokens. Hermes 4 70B has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 28.4, compared to Hermes 4 70B's score of 9.2.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while Hermes 4 70B has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. Hermes 4 70B does not support vision.