Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Opengvlab
Opengvlab

DeepSeek V3.1 vs InternVL3 78B

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

InternVL3 78B wins:

  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1
Speed
DeepSeek V3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3.1InternVL3 78B
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3.1InternVL3 78B
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekOpengvlab
ReleasedAug 2025Unknown

DeepSeek V3.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

InternVL3 78B Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $0.75/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 has a 32,768 token context window, while InternVL3 78B has a 16,384 token context window.
DeepSeek V3.1 does not support vision. InternVL3 78B supports vision.