Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek V3 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
DeepSeek V3
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3Mistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedDec 2024Jul 2024

DeepSeek V3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. DeepSeek V3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.03/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
DeepSeek V3 has a 163,840 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3 does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.