Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

DeepSeek V3 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek V3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3
Context Window
DeepSeek V3
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek V3Kimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek V3Kimi K2 Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMoonshotai
ReleasedDec 2024Nov 2025

DeepSeek V3 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare DeepSeek V3 with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.01/M tokens. DeepSeek V3 has cheaper output pricing at $0.03/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of N/A, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of N/A.
DeepSeek V3 has a 163,840 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek V3 does not support vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.