Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Stepfun-ai

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek Coder 1.3B BaseStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek Coder 1.3B BaseStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekStepfun-ai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base Modalities

Input
Output

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base has a 16,384 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
DeepSeek Coder 1.3B Base does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.