Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs DeepSeek V3.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeek V3.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeek V3.2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedUnknownDec 2025

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B Modalities

Input
Output

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.6, compared to DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B's score of 7.8.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has a 128,000 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision.