Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Meta-llama
Meta-llama

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Context Window
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BLlama 3.3 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMeta-llama
ReleasedUnknownDec 2024

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B Modalities

Input
Output

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.7, compared to DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B's score of 7.8.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has a 128,000 token context window, while Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B does not support vision. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct does not support vision.