Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BMistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BMistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekMistral AI
ReleasedUnknownJul 2024

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B Modalities

Input
Output

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has a 128,000 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.