Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 0528 wins:

  • Better at math

DeepSeek V3.2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2
Speed
DeepSeek V3.2

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedMay 2025Dec 2025

R1 0528 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.26/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.38/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.6, compared to R1 0528's score of 24.0.
R1 0528 has a 163,840 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 0528 does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 does not support vision.