Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 0528 wins:

  • Has reasoning mode

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.27 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.75$0.41 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Cache Read (per 1M)$200000.00$135000.00 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is 59% cheaper overall.

R1 0528 Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.50
DeepInfra $0.50
AtlasCloud $0.55
Novita $0.70

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.40
AtlasCloud $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 0528 Wins
6
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
27.034.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
24.037.9
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
76.096.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
84.986.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
81.387.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
77.089.6
Aider
Real-world code editing
71.4--
AIME
Competition math
89.3--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 0528
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 0528
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens

Speed Performance

MetricR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Tokens/second0.0 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.00s0.00s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 0528DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedMay 2025Dec 2025

R1 0528 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 0528 with:

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper output pricing at $0.41/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to R1 0528's score of 24.0.
R1 0528 has a 163,840 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 0528 does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision.