Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Xiaomi

R1 0528 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

R1 0528 wins:

  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 0528MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 0528MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorDeepseekXiaomi
ReleasedMay 2025Mar 2026

R1 0528 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 0528 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Omni with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to R1 0528's score of 24.0.
R1 0528 has a 163,840 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
R1 0528 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.