Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Xiaomi

R1 0528 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

R1 0528 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
R1 0528
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
R1 0528
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 0528MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 0528MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorDeepseekXiaomi
ReleasedMay 2025Unknown

R1 0528 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 0528 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 0528 has cheaper input pricing at $0.45/M tokens. R1 0528 has cheaper output pricing at $2.15/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to R1 0528's score of 24.0.
R1 0528 has a 163,840 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
R1 0528 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.