Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 Distill Llama 70B vs DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Llama 70B wins:

  • Faster response time

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Speed
R1 Distill Llama 70B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Llama 70BDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Llama 70BDeepSeek V3.1 Terminus
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedJan 2025Sep 2025

R1 Distill Llama 70B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper input pricing at $0.21/M tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has cheaper output pricing at $0.79/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.9, compared to R1 Distill Llama 70B's score of 11.4.
R1 Distill Llama 70B has a 131,072 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 Distill Llama 70B does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus does not support vision.