Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Deepseek
Deepseek

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Speed
R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.27 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.41 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$135000.00 DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 5% cheaper overall.

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Providers

NextBit $0.29 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30
Cloudflare $0.50

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Providers

Chutes $0.27 (Cheapest)
Parasail $0.40
AtlasCloud $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Distill Qwen 32B Wins
5
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 Distill Qwen 32BDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.234.1
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-37.9-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
63.096.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.986.3
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.587.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.089.6
AIME
Competition math
68.7--
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
163,840
tokens
Max output: 65,536 tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 80% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeWinner
Tokens/second56.1 tok/s0.0 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.00s
R1 Distill Qwen 32B responds Infinity% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorDeepseekDeepseek
ReleasedJan 2025Dec 2025

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale with:

Frequently Asked Questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has cheaper input pricing at $0.27/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 37.9, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 163,840 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale does not support vision.