Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Minimax
Minimax

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs MiniMax M2.7

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiniMax M2.7 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
MiniMax M2.7
Context Window
MiniMax M2.7
Speed
R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.7
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BMiniMax M2.7
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMinimax
ReleasedJan 2025Mar 2026

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiniMax M2.7 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare MiniMax M2.7 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.29/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
MiniMax M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.9, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while MiniMax M2.7 has a 204,800 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. MiniMax M2.7 does not support vision.