Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Kimi K2 Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
Kimi K2 Thinking

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.40 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$1.75 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$200000.00 Kimi K2 Thinking
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 61% cheaper overall.

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Providers

NextBit $0.29 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30
Cloudflare $0.50

Kimi K2 Thinking Providers

Chutes $0.40 (Cheapest)
DeepInfra $0.47
Parasail $0.50
SiliconFlow $0.55
AtlasCloud $0.60

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Distill Qwen 32B Wins
5
Kimi K2 Thinking Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 Distill Qwen 32BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.240.7
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-34.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
63.094.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.984.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.583.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.085.3
AIME
Competition math
68.7--
Kimi K2 Thinking significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking
262,144
tokens
Max output: 65,535 tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 88% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BKimi K2 ThinkingWinner
Tokens/second56.1 tok/s82.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s0.64s
Kimi K2 Thinking responds 46% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BKimi K2 Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BKimi K2 Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekMoonshotai
ReleasedJan 2025Nov 2025

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.29/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Kimi K2 Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 34.8, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while Kimi K2 Thinking has a 262,144 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision.