Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-5 Mini

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5 Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5 Mini
Context Window
GPT-5 Mini
Speed
GPT-5 Mini

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5 MiniWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.29$0.25 GPT-5 Mini
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.29$2.00 R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$25000.00 GPT-5 Mini
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 58% cheaper overall.

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Providers

NextBit $0.29 (Cheapest)
Novita $0.30
Cloudflare $0.50

GPT-5 Mini Providers

OpenAI $0.25 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.25 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
0
R1 Distill Qwen 32B Wins
5
GPT-5 Mini Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5 MiniWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
17.241.0
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-35.3-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
63.090.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
73.983.7
GPQA
Graduate-level science
61.582.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
27.083.8
AIME
Competition math
68.7--
GPT-5 Mini significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32,768
tokens
Max output: 32,768 tokens
GPT-5 Mini
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5 Mini has a 92% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5 MiniWinner
Tokens/second56.1 tok/s126.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.47s60.75s
GPT-5 Mini responds 126% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5 Mini
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5 Mini
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorDeepseekOpenAI
ReleasedJan 2025Aug 2025

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5 Mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare GPT-5 Mini with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5 Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.25/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
GPT-5 Mini scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.3, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5 Mini has a 400,000 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. GPT-5 Mini supports vision.