Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Deepseek
Deepseek
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs GPT-5.3 Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

R1 Distill Qwen 32B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Better at math

GPT-5.3 Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.3 Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.3 Codex
Speed
GPT-5.3 Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.3 Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyR1 Distill Qwen 32BGPT-5.3 Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorDeepseekOpenAI
ReleasedJan 2025Feb 2026

R1 Distill Qwen 32B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.3 Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare R1 Distill Qwen 32B with:

Compare GPT-5.3 Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper input pricing at $0.29/M tokens. R1 Distill Qwen 32B has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
GPT-5.3 Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 53.1, compared to R1 Distill Qwen 32B's score of N/A.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B has a 32,768 token context window, while GPT-5.3 Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not support vision. GPT-5.3 Codex supports vision.